HPAI · Finished editorial example

A checked summary with its evidence

The library pilot ran for four weeks in September. Twenty volunteers registered; sign-in sheets support 12 attendees and 31 visits, including repeat visits. Nine attendees returned feedback forms; seven found the sessions useful. A draft spreadsheet lists 14 attendees, an unresolved discrepancy. Another trial is recommended only if a room and funding are approved; no funding is committed. Reading-skill changes and long-term participation were not measured.

66 words. No causal claim or approval has been added.

Summary claim	Source	Supporting phrase
Four weeks in September; 20 registered	P1	“four weeks in September”; “Twenty volunteers registered”
12 attendees; 31 visits with repeats	P2, P4	“Twelve volunteers attended”; “31 visits”; “sign-in sheets support 12”
Nine respondents; seven useful ratings	P3	“Nine attendees returned feedback forms. Seven said the sessions were useful.”
14 vs 12 remains unresolved	P4	“lists 14 attendees”; “not yet resolved the discrepancy”
Trial conditional; no funding committed	P5	“subject to room availability and funding approval”; “No funding has been committed.”
No measured reading or long-term outcome	P6	“did not measure changes in reading skills or long-term participation”